Parliamentary Panel recommends food entitlements for 67 p.c. of population

The on Food and Consumer Affairs has suggested that food entitlements under the National Act be made available to 67 per cent of the population, leaving out the 33 per cent who pay taxes, have a pucca house and so on.

It wants the ‘priority’ (Below Poverty Line) and ‘general’ (Above Poverty Line) categories to go and be replaced with “inclusion” and “exclusion” categories.

The identification of beneficiaries for subsidised rice and wheat under the Public Distribution System will be done by State governments.

The committee, headed by Vilas Muttemwar, has decided to speed up submission of its report to the Lok Sabha Speaker as the issue is likely to come up in the Congress party’s “ chintan shivir ” in Jaipur, later this week.

According to informed sources, the panel has assessed the total requirements of foodgrains at 62 million tonnes per annum with a subsidy bill of over Rs. 1.15 lakh crore.

The Central government will make subsidised foodgrains available to 67 per cent of the population, including 75 rural and 50 per cent urban, even though States have different estimates of the poor.

The Act was referred to the Parliamentary panel in December 2011 after it was tabled in the Lok Sabha amid demand for a universal .

Millets body launches Take Voices campaign seeking inclusion in food bill

Nandita Vijay, Bangalore

Network of India (MNI) is aggressively working to ensure that are included in food grains in the National Bill (FSB).

In this regard, it has initiated a national campaign – Take Voices to MPs – wherein the public has been asked to send postcards and emails to them highlighting the benefits of millets in daily diets and their indispensability to the public distribution system (PDS).

“During the winter session of Parliament, the crucial is due to be discussed and we wish to emphasise upon them, the importance of the provision that talks of including millets in food grains. The other effort is to underscore the significance of the provision on decentralised PDS, as envisaged in Chapter VII of FSB,” explains Sandeep K, programme coordinator, Deccan Development Society, Hyderabad, and national coordinator, Millet Network of India.

“The campaign aims to urge the MPs to take cognisance of the significance of these provisions in the FSB, and ensure that the debate for the passage of this Bill encompasses these issues, strengthens them, and ensure that they are present in the Act that emerges from such debates,” he adds.

In this regard, MNI has highlighted the benefits of millets, which are known to have high level of nutrition content than rice. The network has called upon public to send ‘en-masse’ postcards to respective Members of Parliament (MPs) underscoring the two points on the need for their inclusion in PDS and better nutritive value compared to rice. “This envisages involvement of members of communities on a massive scale, and the mailing of thousands of postcards to the MPs, a number large enough to draw their attention to the issues on hand,” Sandeep said.

According to MNI, for millet-activists the draft FSB makes an important mention in relation to millets in PDS. Since its inception, PDS has been based entirely on rice and wheat, to the exclusion of millets. While it has served the nation well by providing the poor with the much-needed food grains, it has suffered from two serious flaws, the effects of which are being felt only now. One is the growing incidence of malnutrition and the other, the diabetes cases in India, owing to the PDS rice scheme.

It has been scientifically proven that millets are miles ahead of rice and wheat in terms of nutritional content. For instance, millets contain 10.6 gm of protein per kilogram, as against rice which contains only 6.8 gm. Similarly, millets are also richer in fibre (1.3 gm to 10.1 gm), minerals (1.9 gm to 4.4 gm) and calcium (31 mg to 344 mg), in comparison to rice and wheat. All these characteristics make millets the ideal solution for the climate crisis that is looming ahead of India.

Meanwhile, the ability of rice and wheat to survive climate crisis is suspect. Studies indicate that a change of 2 degree Celsius in the temperature of earth would render wheat incapable of growing, as wheat is a highly thermal-sensitive crop. Rice, which requires stagnant water to grow (a kilogram of rice needs 4,000 litres of water), would also be unsuitable in the face of global warming as rice fields emanate methane, a greenhouse gas.

Furthermore, millets are crops that can survive the harshest and the most vagarious of climatic conditions. It has been shown that millets can grow in conditions of low rainfall—requiring as little as 300 to 350 mm of rainfall, depending on the type of millet—and in poor and heavily degraded soils; which are the characteristic traits of the arid and semi-arid regions, and of the hilly regions of India. While wheat and rice only provide food security, millets provide multiple securities: food, fodder, health, nutrition, livelihood and ecological benefits to rural households; making them the crops of agricultural security, according to MNI.

Bills affecting agriculture before parliament for approaval

friends

there are five which are pending before parliament and may come up for approval in this session starting from22nd nov.

We request you to kindly share the following concerns and suggestions on these bills with your MPs and request them to bring them up while during discussion.  This would of great help. We keep you posted on the developments.

Courtesy: Dr. Donthi Narasimha Reddy

BRAI Bill-clausewise problems

Pesticide Bill-clausewise problems

Seed Bill 2010 – Problems and suggestions

Suggestions on LA-APKisan

ASHA response to National Food Security Bill

pls contact ramoo.csa@gmail.com for other language versions

Food Security Bill: Is it well thought out?


Deccan Chronicle, October 24, 2011 By Suman Sahai

The efforts of the government to tackle growing hunger with food support schemes like the Public Distribution System (PDS), the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) and the mid-day meal scheme for schoolchildren has a mixed record. The most recent in this line of efforts to improve the hunger situation is the National (NFSB).
There is also a Bill drafted by the Sonia Gandhi-headed National Advisory Council (NAC), which, given its provenance, is being considered by the government, but reactions to its contents have been mixed. An expert committee headed by C. Rangarajan stated that the entitlements in the NAC draft (90 per cent coverage of the rural population and 50 per cent of the urban) were not feasible due to unavailability of sufficient foodgrains. They recommended that the entitlements guaranteed for above poverty line households be discarded and that only below poverty line households (as measured by the Tendulkar estimate plus a 10 per cent margin) be included in the scheme.
This would mean coverage of only 46 per cent of the rural population and 28 per cent of the urban. Union agriculture minister Sharad Pawar has expressed doubts about the large quantity of grain procurement that would be required by the NAC draft and said that the issues raised by the Rangarajan Committee are “pertinent”. Civil society groups, too, are divided on the NAC Bill, with some terming it merely a revised form of the PDS.
There are serious shortcomings in the NAC draft. Primary is its extremely restricted scope. This is not a bill that attempts to bring about food security, it is only a bill that offers a different option to the existing PDS system for distributing grains. No attention is paid to the most important components of food security: the production of food, its distribution and its absorption by the poor and hungry. Of the three major pillars of food security, food production, food distribution and food absorption, the NAC draft addresses just one. It is actually more a welfare bill, a “dole”, than an effort to engage with the complex problem of food security.
Tackling food security will mean treading on influential toes. The conflicts will arise over who will have preferential access to productive resources like land and water. Will Coca-Cola get the water for its bottling plant or will farmers get it for their cultivation? Will small farmers in the dry lands get the investments they need to create water bodies to enable them to have a second crop in the winter? The conflicts will be over issues such as fertiliser subsidies. Will Punjab, Haryana, western Uttar Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu continue to be the principal beneficiaries of the government’s subsidies? Or will nutrient-based subsidy be directed at poor quality soils in rainfed areas that mostly need intervention, finally giving these farmers their due? The smallest, most marginal farmers have the worst soils and the least access to water. A Food Security Bill will have meaning only if it tries to swing things in their favour.
The Food Security Bill must tackle the fundamental question of common resources and the right of access to them. It must be able to speak out against Jatropha plantations on common lands conveniently designated as “wasteland”. The biofuel produced in the name of clean energy will take away the grazing lands of herders and pastoralists and the place where they can park their livestock because they have no other land. It will take away the source of leafy green vegetables and medicinal plants that the poor rely on.
Just as it will have to tackle the soft-drinks multinationals, the Food Security Bill must also take a position against the conglomerates grabbing agricultural lands in the name of special economic zones to set up industrial estates (or just to corner real estate). India’s most productive lands, the two-crop and three-crop zones, are being snapped up to build urban estates. Where will we grow our food?
The food production part of the Food Security Bill will also have to deal with putting into place our strategy to ensure food security when faced with climate change. According to the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the impact of climate change will be most severe in Africa and South Asia, especially in its rainfed areas. How do we propose to cope with global warming and still grow sufficient food?
And how can we have food security when the drinking water is dirty and contaminated with pathogens, sanitation facilities do not exist and diarrhoea leaches the body of all nutrients? Children continue to die of diarrhoea and adults continue to sicken with it, unable to retain the little nutrition they get.
To draft a comprehensive Food Security Bill and accommodate the aspects that logically belong there, a lot of people will have to be asked to give up some of what is in their bag of goodies. The bill clearly fights shy of that. But, as if to demonstrate its serious intent, the NAC draft has tacked on several pages of penalties for violations to the substantive text, making this not an enabling bill, but a punishing bill.
Questions have also been raised about the manner of drafting this bill. What kinds of consultations were undertaken? How did the principal stakeholders engage in the process of providing inputs? In what manner were experts and other actors brought on board? How were the public’s views sought? How has this bill attempted to be pluralistic and representative of multiple views?
A greater understanding of food security than is evidenced by the current NAC draft is required to put the right components into such a sensitive law. Otherwise there is the risk of missing key targets and landing up with a law that is meaningless.
A comprehensive approach to food security must comprise all relevant aspects, such as the production (availability) of food, its distribution, and the ability of the poor to absorb and benefit from the food and nutrition that they can access. If we are serious and mean to do the right thing, we must start afresh and draft a new food security legislation.
The writer is a genetic scientist who has served on the faculty of the Universities of Chicago and Heidelberg, is convenor of the Gene Campaign

Move for a hunger-free India

By M S Swaminathan, September 28 2011
The National Bill 2011, which is now on the website http://fcamin.nic.in/dfpd_html/Draft_National_Food_Security_Bill.pdf / of the Uni­on ministry of food and consumer affairs for public comments, aims to make the right to food a legal right. When finally enacted, the will be the brightest jewel in the crown of Indian democracy. Therefore, public scrutiny of the draft bill is important. The draft bill mentions that its aim is “to provide for food and nutritional security in human life-cycle approach by ensuring access to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices, for people to live a life with dignity”. Unfortunately, the bill in its present form will not be able to fulfill this inspiring objective.

The legal commitment contained in the bill implies that every child, woman and man should have physical and economic access to a balanced diet on the basis of a life-cycle approach, that is, from conception to cremation. Nutrition security involves access not only to the required calories and protein, but also to micro-nutrients like iron, iodine, zinc, vitamin A, and vitamin B12. In addition, clean drinking water, sanitation and primary healthcare are essential for ensuring that food is properly assimilated in the body. Food and nutrition security will, thus, need concurrent attention to both food and non-food factors. Obviously, every requirement cannot become a legal right overnight. Therefore, the government has confined the legal right only to economic access with reference to certain quantities of grain, like rice, wheat, and nutri-cereals such as ragi, bajra, jowar and maize, among others. The bill provides for common and differentiated rights. The common rights are designed to ensure that every citizen in the country has access to food. The differentiated rights relate to quantity and cost of the food to be provided to the general category of citizens who are not in need of the same kind of social support as those listed under the priority category.

The bill, to achieve its purpose of nutrition security for all, coupled with respect for human dignity, will need a structure.

Legal entitlements: This will begin with pregnant mothers in order to avoid maternal and foetal malnutrition. The present, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) could be divided into two segments from the point of view of the age of the child. The first 1,000 days starting from conception are exceedingly important for brain development in the child and for avoiding low birth weight at the time of delivery. This is the neglected part of the present ICDS and this is why, we have nearly every fourth child born in the country with a birth weight below 2.5 kg. Such low birth weight children have many handicaps in later life, including impaired cognitive abilities. The older children can be provided nutritious noon meals and also other forms of nutrition support like milk, and nutri-biscuits. As far as adults are concerned, the bill provides for the provision of 7 kg of food grains per person per month in the case of priority households. The price will not exceed Rs 3, 2 or 1 per kg for rice, wheat and nutri-cereals. The draft bill also makes provision for providing support to special groups such as destitutes and the homeless.

Enabling provisions: Food security has three dimensions, namely availability of food, which is a function of production, access to food, which is a function of purchasing power, and absorption of food in the body, which is a function of the availability of clean drinking water, sanitation and primary healthcare. Therefore, the act, to achieve the goal of food and nutrition security, should emphasise the need for effective implementation and close monitoring of the following schemes:
  • Ensuring adequate availability of food by implementing the provisions of the National Policy for Farmers placed in parliament in November 2007, as well as of the sche­mes designed to stimulate hi­gher production such as the Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana, National Food Security Mission, National Horticulture Mission and Mahila Kisan Sa­sakthikaran Pariyojana.
  • Effective implementation of the Rajiv Gandhi National Dr­inking Water Mission, Total Sanitation Programme and Rural Health Mission. We ha­ve to mainstream nutrition in the horticulture mission in order to provide horticultural remedies to nutritional maladies, such as deficiency of iron, iodine or vitamin A. For example, a combination of moringa (drumstick) and ragi or bajra can provide all the needed macro and micro-nutrients.
  • The delivery of these provisions must be made in a “deliver-as- one mode” in order to ensure synergy among the different components of food security.
Reform of public distribution system: Several successful models are already available, for instance, in Chhattisgarh, Ta­mil Nadu and Kerala. Modern technology like smart cards could be used to prevent leakages in delivery. In the ultimate analysis, a corruption-free India will be an essential prerequisite for a hunger-free India.

Building the necessary infrastructure: A food security bill can be implemented only with the help of home-grown food. In other words, the well being of farmers will be essential for ensuring food security. Enhancing small farm productivity is the most effective method of ending endemic hunger in rural India. Hence, we should start building proper storage structures.

The present draft is a good beginning to seriously address issues relating to poverty-induced chronic hunger. We should, however, make a bold and imaginative attempt to rid the country of chronic hunger and malnutrition. 

(The writer is an agricultural scientist who led India’s green revolution).

Draft National Food Security Bill : for your comments

Draft National Bill

In pursuance of the Government’s commitment to enact National Food Security Act, the Department of Food and Public Distribution, Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution, have prepared a draft National , link to which is given below. Comments/suggestions on the draft Bill may be sent upto 30.09.2011 by email to ecoadv.fpd@nic.in or at the following address:

Under Secretary (),
Department of Food & Public Distribution,
Room No. 459,
Krishi Bhawan, New Delhi-110001

Click here for draft National Food Security Bill.