Farm widows in india fear crop of creditors

Run Date: 01/16/07

By Aparna Pallavi
WeNews correspondent

In the past three years, farmers in a central India region have committed suicide by the thousands following bad harvests. Now, their widows are left to grieve and worry about the arrival of moneylenders and debts they don’t understand.

Rekha Gurnule, left, and Chandrakala Meshram

NAGPUR, India (WOMENSENEWS)–A stuffed wildcat still hangs in the little verandah of Chadrakala Meshram’s house.

Her late husband, who hanged himself on Oct. 2, 2006, killed and stuffed the animal himself for a local festival, she says, her eyes lighting up.

“He would perform at the festivals every year,” she says. “He was a cheerful man. He loved to have fun; never one to brood or sit around sulking.”

What could have made him commit suicide?

“I don’t understand,” says Chandrakala, her eyes clouding. “For the last three years the crops were bad. He looked very tired. He would not talk much. He stopped telling me where he got the money he was bringing into the house. Even today I don’t know how much we owe, and to whom.”

(First names are being used in the story to aid identification since many people live in tribal communities where a whole village or several villages may share the same clan name.)

Policy-makers, social activists and media commentators here have been grappling with an outbreak of more than 3,000 suicides in the past three years among male farmers of Vidarbha, a region in Maharashtra state.

But while onlookers wonder and debate how to stop the suicides, the steady pace continues with a new suicide tally beginning to build for 2007, a year that is only a couple of weeks old.

The crisis leaves women such as Chandrakala struggling to cope with serious financial uncertainties.

Second Growing Season

Kharif–the first crop after the monsoon season spanning from July to October–has mainly been harvested and the second crop is now coming along.

As many farm widows do what they can to keep up with these demands, they and their families are apprehensive about the debts their deceased relatives left behind. Many don’t know the size of those debts or even who will come to collect or when.

“I will just accept what they say,” says Chandrakala, referring to moneylenders. “The man is gone. How can I fight with anyone now?”

Chandrakala, who lives in a village in the region of Vidarbha–which has seen the largest number of farmers’ suicides–says that her husband first borrowed about $300 from a cooperative bank, which typically charge annual interest rates of between 7 percent and 9 percent.

When repeated crop failures in the last four years made him unable to repay he started getting private loans from sources unknown to Chandrakala. She says she does not know either the amount of money he had borrowed, from whom or the rate of interest he negotiated. It is common for moneylenders in this region to charge around 10 percent a month or between 120 percent and 300 percent a year.

“Loans are nothing new to farmers,” says elderly Bhagiratha Shende, another villager in the Yavatmal district of Vidarbha whose husband committed suicide several years ago. “We would take loans at the time of sowing and return them after crops as a matter of course. But the loans of today are not like those. They are jeevghenya (life takers).”

Bhagiratha’s second son Anil Shende committed suicide in August. Vandana Shende, his 28-year-old widow, is also a farmer’s daughter.

‘Resowing Such a Horror’

“Resowing is such a horror these days,” the young widow says and talks about the $25 cost of a small bag of seeds. “My husband had to take too much loan this year because our crops got washed away by rain twice. Earlier it was not like that.”

She says the cost of supplies has risen to such an extent that they barely covered what they sell from their cotton harvest.

Unlike many widows, she at least has a sense of what she owes. Anil, who was farming three acres of land, owed about $300 to a cooperative bank and another $1,200 or so to private moneylenders.

More farm widows are like Rekha Gurnule, who doesn’t know the scale of the debts her husband acquired before his death. “Earlier my husband would discuss every loan he was contemplating with me,” she says. “But in the last five or six years things began to go bad.”

She says the rising costs of seeds and the onset of droughts and floods drove her husband to make deals that he didn’t talk about. “He started getting haphazard and unplanned loans to meet farming expenses. Around that time he stopped telling me where he was getting the money, how much he was borrowing.”

Silence Sounds the Alarm

“Among us farmers, men do not believe in troubling their families with painful things,” says Urkuda Bai Atram, an elderly suicide widow. “Men may discuss finances with their families in peace time, but when the pressure mounts they clam up. Then you know it is time to worry.”

While women have the legal right to own property, the common practice among older widows is to simply hand over their land to their sons and become farm laborers.

Some, like Bhagiratha Bai, have divided the land among the sons, keeping one share for themselves.

Very young widows, especially those with no children, can be compelled to return to their parental homes. About 30 percent of all the widows in the Vidarbha region have lost their land, according to the Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti, a group that has been collecting information on the region’s suicides.

For the younger widows with small children, the problem of keeping their farms going is overwhelming.

“I will have to employ a gadi, won’t I?” says Chandrakala, referring to a contract farm manager. “That will be expensive. I will have to pay a big sum to him every year, which will add to my expenses.”

Aparna Pallavi is a freelance writer in India specializing in development issues.

Orissa's debt ridden farmers committing suicide

By ANI

Sunday January 14, 08:41 PM

olangir (Orissa), Jan 14 (ANI): Hundreds of small and marginal farmers in Orissa’s Bolangir district are committing suicide due to their inability to pay back the money loaned from the private moneylenders for growing cotton.

The failure of the cotton crop this year has led to the suicidal death of Gangaram, a farmer here.

Apart from him, many other farmers have been committing suicide, since they have been unable to pay debts to the private moneylenders.

Hundreds of small and marginal farmers lured by the cash crop -cotton, has been borrowing money from the private money lenders at a phenomenal interest rate ranging from 25 percent to 80 percent here.

Now, most of the cotton farmers have left the village and more are planning to leave in search of alternate means of livelihood.

Gouri Dila, a cotton farmer said that he had grown cotton in 1.5 acres of land by borrowing money from a local moneylender. He also said how the private moneylenders charge so much interest that most of the farmers are unable to repay because of failure of the cotton crop.

“We were cultivating cotton but due to cotton failure three members of my family have left this work and had shifted to a brick kiln. Rest of three members are here and managing ourselves with much difficulty. We have been cultivating cotton in half area of our land, but all got destroyed due to dry spell, that’s why our family is facing problem,” complained Gouri Dila, a cotton farmer.

Another cotton farmer said that due to unfavourable conditions and the high interest charged by the moneylender his family members have ventured out.

“My son had never left home earlier. This time he had to migrate due to cotton farming. Most of the members of my family have left their homes and gone to work in brick klins. One of my sons has also left the village to work at a far place as a labourer. I am alone here,” said Hiramani, another cotton farmer.

The Chairman of the Cotton Federation, Dr. Murrari Prasad Sharma said that due to lack of funds their organisation has been unable to purchase cotton from the farmers, as a result they are forced to depend on the Mahajans (local village money lenders).

“I have been appointed as the Chairman of the Cotton Federation, but there is nothing in the office; no money, nothing. When the cotton farmers need money to cultivate cotton, they take money from the businessmen with high interest. Because of the dry spell the output is not so good and so when they pay the money back they are not left with any thing. For example when they (farmers) want Rupees 5000, the Mahajans charge interest that amounts to double of the loan. So how will the farmers will be able to pay them back?” said Dr. Sharma.

In the absence of institutional credit and corrupt wheeler-dealers, the farmers tend to opt for middlemen and moneylenders.

Ironically, crop like cotton is the major agricultural product in Bolangir, Halahand and Koraput region because of the favourable agro-climate condition. But due to lack of facilities, the farmers are shifting to other crops or are migrating in search of jobs. (ANI)

India: Bumper cotton yield fails to resolve agrarian crisis

January 18, 2007

http://www.fibre2fashion.com/news/textile-news/new…

Bumper cotton yield in the 2006-2007 season failed to resolve agrarian crisis that farmers in Maharashtra are facing.

Even after bumper cotton yield, Government officials declared special relief packages to curb farmers’ suicides in Vidarbha.

While Maharashtra cotton marketing federation estimated yield of around 27.5 million quintals, Cotton Advisory Board revised its estimates to 25 million quintals now.

According to estimate, about 15 million quintals of cotton have been traded by private traders, Cotton Corporation of India and the state federation till mid-January.

During this season, cotton productivity increased from three quintals per acre to six on an average. Even the cost of production also increased and farmers have to invest between Rs8,000 and Rs10,000 which include cost of pesticides and fertilisers and labour charges.

Although cost of production has increased, private buyers are offering farmers an average price between Rs1,800 to Rs2,000 per quintal.

Five Farmers commit suicide in Vidarbha

Pradip Kumar Maitra

Nagpur, January 18, 2007

Advertisement

Several government efforts to curb the farmers’ suicides in Vidarbha did not seem to have its desired impact as five more farmers ended their lives in the last 48 hours, taking the toll to 44 this month alone.

The poverty-stricken cotton growers, who ended their lives were: Sudhir Wadaskar of Junera, Pisaram Zhade, Rekepara (both in Chandrapur district), Tulshiram Patil of Ramapur (Akola), Raju Walki of Tijason (Yavatmal) and Pandurang Dethe of Satgaon of Buldhana district.

The crisis in the region is deepening in the cotton sale season as cotton growers are not getting good deal from the state-sponsored procurement centres.

Apart from the remunerative price, farmers who are trying to sell their goods, say that this year very few government centres that buy cotton at the support price have been set up. Moreover, the centres are forcibly deducting 50 per cent of loan amounts from the sale money which is ruining the annual economy of small and marginal farmers.

It has left the poor farmers at the mercy of private traders, who are exploiting the situation and giving them a meagre rate, at least Rs 100 less per quintal than the support price.

Over 260 cotton growers have ended their lives since the cotton sale season began in November last. The plight of farmers shows that the relief packages from the state and union governments had hardly any impact on them. Even the government officials also admit that though both the relief measures did make some difference, but suicides continued unabated.

The PM relief package, announced by Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in July last year, is largely meant for projects which will take three to five years to complete.

Kishore Tiwari of Vidarbha Janandolan Samiti says, with cultivation of cotton turning into a highly losing proposition, more than 40 per cent of the farming population has expressed the desire to quit and migrate to urban centres for other options. He insisted an urgent intervention of the state government in the matter.

In December 2005 when the Vilasrao Deshmukh Government rolled out an Rs 1,075-crore relief module, more than 200 farmers had ended their lives. An alarmed Congress government in the state did almost everything that it could in the first half of 2006 to curb the suicide rate.

The state rescheduled crop loans, waived off interest on outstanding debt, banned illegal money-lending, encouraged diversified crop pattern and ancillary activities and gave direct monetary assistance to widows of farmers. Towards the end of the year, the government even came up with an aid of Rs 1,500 per hectare for cotton growers.

However, these also could not yield desired dividends.

The divisional commissioner of Amravati divsion and coordinator of government packages, points out the problem would not solve only by providing loans of waiving of loan interests. “We should ensure that the farmers should get more income by using minimum agriculture inputs,” he added.

According to him, the government had provided Rs 1,844-crore loans to farmers in six districts in the region this year in comparison to Rs 746-crore last year.

“It is a fact that despite all efforts, farmers could not generate more income,” he regretted.

Five Maharashtra farmers commit suicide

Indo Asian News Service, January 15 2007
http://www.dailyindia.com/show/103537.php/Five-Maharashtra-farmers-commit-suicide
Five cotton-growers in Vidarbha region of Maharashtra have committed suicide after crop failure, taking the number of such suicides to 33 since the New Year.
Two of the five farmers who ended their lives Sunday hailed from Akola district while one each was from Buldana, Nagpur and Yavatmal, Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti (VJAS) president Kishor Tiwari said here Monday.
In the 72 hours preceding this tragedy, eight other farmers had ended their lives, Tiwari told IANS.
The previous year’s toll in Vidarbha was well over 1,000 – almost at the rate of 100 suicides a month.
The continuing suicide saga falsifies the government claim of a bumper cotton crop, Tiwari said. Total cotton procurement in Vidarbha so far, a major chunk of which was done by private traders, is 10 million quintals as against the government prediction of 35 million quintals, he pointed out.
The state controlled cotton federation opened fewer procurement centres this year pushing the farmers to private traders who paid Rs.100 per quintal less to them than the federation, Tiwari said.
“The stark reality of farmers’ suicides bares the failure of Bt cotton (genetically modified cottonseeds) in rain-fed conditions,” the VJAS leader remarked adding that the relief package from the state and the central government had benefited the cooperative banks alone, compensating them against the interest on farmers’ loans that the government had waived.
The plight of cotton growers can be gauged from the fact that farmers in Koljhari village in Yavatmal district took a New Year vow not to cultivate cotton any more, Tiwari said.
“The government must compensate the cotton growers for their loss like it had done last year (by paying Rs.2.1 billion to 1.7 million farmers) because it had promoted the sale of Bt cottonseeds marketed by American company Monsanto”, he demanded.

Society and suicide

By Amit Chamaria
22 September, 2006
Countercurrents.org
Certainly, a significant attention specially the PrimeMinister Manmohan Singh’s attention towards Vidarbha district of Maharashtra is a welcome sign but of the consequences of unpleasant incidents. Obviously, not only the farmers of Maharashtra but the farmers of all states of India are under distress. But the problem of farmer suicides in Maharashtra has acquired the greater length. The number of suicides particularly, in Maharashtra has risen from1083 in 1995 to 4,147 in 2004.However recent announcement of relief package worth of rupees 3750 corers by the Prime Minister to solving the egregious condition of farmers has compelled to do a comprehensive debate by raising the question that-”Is this relief package a satisfactory solution of the problem of farmer suicide?”
Now, it is essential to understand the social analysis of suicide as a social problem. In this situation the significant work of Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist can’t be forgotten. As per Durkheim’s view simply, ‘suicide’ means ‘self destruction’. But it reveals something lots. At least after the serial suicidal death of Vidarbha’s farmers, it didn’t remain confine to merely ‘self destruction’-the simple means of suicide. If we go by Durkheim, suicide is a social fact and not simply an individual act but a product of social forces external to the individual. In fact, He rejects the various extra social factors such as heredity, climate, mental alienation, racial characteristics and imitation as the cause of suicide. Even ‘Poverty’ – the most general cause of suicide, as presented by media and politicians behind the every case of suicide, has been utterly rebutted by him. He, for simple understanding, argues that the greater the integration of individuals within the social group the less likely they are to commit suicide.
Apparently, one thing must be raised in our mind that why Durkheim negates poverty as one of the causes of suicide. If we believe at least some amount on a survey report conducted by the agency of the Govt. of India that reveals most developed states have more suicide rate as compared to the most backward states. In 2001, Maharashtra (14618), Karnataka (11881), Tamil Nadu (11290), Andhra Pradesh (10522) have highest suicide rates respectively. On the other hand all tribal dominated states like Arunachal Pradesh (111), Manipur (41), Mizorum (54), Sikkim (94), and the most backward states like Bihar (603) and Jharkand (250) have very less suicide rate. The place Kalahandi in Orissa at one time was the center of attention in media only because of serial deaths of persons and children due to hungry and malnutrition respectively. But it is quiet surprising that no suicide case was reported from Kalahandi at that time.
In addition to this, as per the ‘ Situation Assessment Survey of Farmers’ conducted by National Sample Survey Organisation in 2003, the average monthly income (excluding rent, interest, dividend etc.) from all sources per farmer household ranged from Rs.1, 062.00 in the state of Orissa to Rs. 5,488.00 in the state of Jammu and Kashmir during the agriculture year of 2002 -03 and the all India average are Rs.2, 115.00.
To compare the average monthly income of per farmer household in Maharashtra (Rs.2, 463.00) and Gujarat (Rs.2, 684.00) from backward states like Bihar (Rs.1, 810.00), Orissa (1,062), Rajasthan (Rs. 1,498) and Madhya Pradesh (1,430.00), it can be easily revealed that lower monthly income is not a causative factor of suicide. By analyzing these statements it can be said that Durkheim is very close to the truth.
Then, what are the causes of farmer suicides?
According to him, this kind of suicide falls within the purview of ‘Anomic Suicide’ – one of the classifications of suicide. In fact, anomic suicide results from normlessness or deregulation in society. Although this kind of suicide occurs during industrial and financial crises, it is not because they cause poverty, since crises of prosperity have the same result but because they are crises of the collective order. If poverty and starvation are really the adequate causes of suicide then the suicide rate in all backward and northeastern states should have been high but it is not. Further he says that poverty protects against suicide because it is a restraint itself. The less one has the less he is tempted to extend the range of his needs. Sociologically, the incident of farmer suicides in Punjab, Andhra Pradesh, and Maharashtra due to indebtedness is actually the result of the combined effect of ‘Relative deprivation’ and ‘Sudden crises’, which came in the category of anomic suicide. Significantly, the feelings of relative deprivation are the outcome of the first green revolution and these feelings has been augmented by the present market policy of Globalization. And it is one of the major drawbacks of the first green revolution. One thing that is essentially noticeable that mainly middle class peasants have committed suicide in that the effect of relative deprivation has fallen greater on them. The big achievement of the first green revolution was the enhancement of crops only by quantitatively not qualitatively.
Now, what should be the solutions of this menace? There are certain measures that should be adopted while formulating the new agriculture policy. Firstly, it is essential to provide better irrigation system and adequate rural infrastructure. So for better farming, farmers should be self-dependent and it can be achieved by maximizing the expenditure on irrigation and other basic facilities. Ironically, India has yet only one rural management institute IRMA after the 57 years of independence though major part of GDP depends on agriculture. Secondly, the causes should be found out that compel the farmers to taking debt either from moneylender or private and govt. banks. Essentially, farmers take debt mainly for boring well and for purchasing seeds and fertilizers.
So govt. should provide adequate irrigation system without disturbing the ecological cycle and a training camp must be organized in various places to provide the knowledge of rain harvesting system. And a comprehensive seed policy should be formulated but not under the pressure of WTO so that farmers could easily get seeds from their own product. The role of moneylender should be the least and in this place co-operative bank come should forward. One thing that is the most vital solution to the distress of farmers is to provide a better market without the intervention of mediators. A policy-”farmer’s approach to market directly” should be adopted. But market should not be under the control of MNCs and some big business elites. The concept of market must be based on co-operative principle. Apparently the cotton cultivators committed suicide due to lack of proper market. Undoubtedly agriculture is the biggest source of employment generation. But the employment in agriculture is reducing gradually in accompanying with green revolution and increase in agricultural technology. Significantly the rate of development of employment in agriculture sector has reduced to 0.18 in 1994 from 2.17 in 1988, according to national sample survey report. The people are leaving off the practice of cultivation day by day. The situation of our agriculture will be improved only and only when people come forward for farming with their own pleasure but not as perfunctory. If the second green revolution would be the offshoot of the first green revolution then there is no need of second green revolution because we all have seen the aftermaths of first green revolution. Now it is time to frame a comprehensive policy for the development of sustainable agriculture with considering the every pros and cons in Indian perspective. A policy should be for “Aam Kisan” in that they are the real cultivators.
Amit Chamaria is a freelance journalist.He has done PG in Sociology From PU.
Address:
Amit Chamaria
C-251, Sector-19
Rohini; Delhi-85
Ph: – 9868457198

5 more farmers ended their lives in Vidarbha

Pradip Kumar Maitra

Nagpur, January 13, 2007

Five more farmers have given up their lives in Vidarbha region in last 48 hours. This takes the toll of farmers’ suicides in the region to 25 this month alone.

Among five farmers, who ended their lives in last 48 hours, two were from Amravati district while one each from Wardha, Nagpur and Bhandara district. They were identified as: Sudhakar Lonare of Nipani, Gajanan Thakre, Pardi (both in Amravati district), Ramesh Madke, Dohangaon (Nagpur), Vasant Salunke of Bhuiwar (Bhandara) and Kiran Sathone of Paunar in the neighbouring Wardha district. Incidentally, Paunar is the place where veteran Gandhian, Acharya Vinoba Bhave launched Bhudan movement.

With this, the toll has touched to 1282 since June 2005. As many as 112 farmers have committed suicide in the region last month while the figure was 107 in November.

Kishore Tiwari of Vidarbha Janandolan Samiti, alleged that the grants from Central and State governments proved beneficial only to district co-operative banks and societies, instead of the farmers, which is responsible for deaths. Moreover, the cotton growers are not getting remunerative price despite the fact that cultivation of cotton has become more expensive in the wake of phenomenal hike in agriculture inputs.

He alleged that government sponsored cotton marketing federation is not opening more procuring centers thus farmers were compelled to sell their produces to private traders, who are paying Rs 100 less per quintal of cotton as against support prices declared by the government.

“The cotton growers should get at least Rs 2, 500 per quintal, if the government really wants to bail them out from the crisis,” he insisted.

The situation of cotton growers could be gauged from the fact that farmers at Koljhari village in Yavatmal district had vowed not to grow cotton any more in their New Year resolution.

Koljhari village was selected for the high profile visit of Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh in June-July last year in the region.

However, N Arumugham, the managing director of Maharashtra State Cotton Marketing Federation, denied the charges that procurement centres were not enough to buy raw cotton from the farmers.

The cotton marketing federation has set up over 240 procurement centres all over the state. He alleged that cotton growers were attracted to private traders even in lesser price because traders don’t deduct money while federation has been deducting 50 per cent of the selling money for loan adjustment.

Email Pradip Kumar Maitra : pradipmaitra@hindustantimes.com

India Dying the suicide crops

INDIA DYING – The suicide crops

http://www.oeilpublic.com/diaporama.php?r=339

December2006. One farmer commits suicide every height hours in the Vidarbha, region in east of Maharashtra, cotton belt of India. Outward sign of a deep land crisis unequalled since the Green Revolution of the 70s, the disastrous situation went from 122 suicides in 2002, 622 in 2004, to more than 1300 in 2006… leaving behind it entire families in a deep despair and hundred of villages very worried. A crisis with pure political origins.
Monsanto, the american multinational company of biotech business receives in 2002 New Delhi’s authorisation to cultivate and put on the market its genetically modified seeds called the Bt Cotton. This kind has actually already been experimented by the firm for five years on the indian lands, and an important contamination in 2001 has obviously sped up the authorisation process. Follows an intense marketing and advertisement campaign. The farmers jumped on this grain of hope.
But it is expensive. To cultivate Bt Cotton is four times more expensive than the traditional seeds.
Then the expected yield is not always there. This variety needs a good irrigation – between 1960 until nowadays, the irrigation surface of Maharashtra state went from a small 10,5% to a pitiful 16% among which 57% would go to only 2% of the peasants, sugar tycoons, often very rich land owners and politically well connected.
The buying price of the quintal during the harvest as opposed to the electoral promises has gone down again compared to the year before… The State has put an end to its policy of public aid since two years, it doesn’t guarantee the buying at the fixed cost of the production. Now, the prices are based on the world rates. But American subsidized cotton that arrives in India is 40% less expensive than the local one. The custom barrier has gone down to 10%, the one on sugar is still 60%. It’s complete cynicism considering that the buyers are more and more the people selling the seeds…and the private money-lenders themselves! A merciless stranglehold. In the best of cases, the production will cost 20% more than the selling price.
The public land credit has considerably gone down into the countryside and the peasants have to turn to the money-lenders, using an exorbitant interest rate.
The great majority of the peasants who ended up excessively indebt or who committed suicide had gone to transgenic cotton, or pirate copies.
« India is taking the direction of wiping out smallholding farming (about 3/4 of the 60% of farmers in the country) in favour of corporate farming. That’s what the decks are being cleared for. The indian farmers are the last surviving body of small farmers in the world. They’re being finished. The agricultural policy is one of calculated neglect and gutting of agriculture. (…) What is Agriculture Minister Sharad Pawar doing for farmers ? He wants us all to be out of business and hand over the land to US companies on contract. » P. Sainath Rural Affairs Editor at The Hindu (national daily).
The urban-rural divide is now there. In the indian way it means the creation of a land elite, like it is done in the schooling system. And just let the others manage themselves…
In India, where the song of the sirens of the economical power to be, of India’s century, of the worldwide influence, echoes in the cities, the image of world economical power with 60% of farmers seems indeed absurd.
According to a study published in March 2002 from NSSO (National Sample Survey Organisation), 40% of the Indian peasants want to quit their job. The high authorities certainly couldn’t expect better.
Johann Rousselot / Oeil Public Agency
c ell : India +91 991 0708 103 / France +33 660 75 20 84
land line : India +91 11 4656 2090
@ email : johannrousselot@yahoo.fr

13 more farmers commits suicides

TIMES NEWS NETWORK
http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/ml.asp?
Ref=TkdUT0kvMjAwNy8wMS8xMCNBcjAwNDAx&Mode=HTML&Locale=english-skin-custom
Nagpur: Not much has changed for the farmers of Vidarbha. In the first week of the new year, 13 of them have committed suicide. As many 1,050 farmers ended their lives last year, the highest in any year so far in the region that is reeling under agrarian crisis of unprecedented proportion, according to farm activists.
The 13 farmers who embraced death till Sunday were identified as Devidas Dahat (village Anadoha , Wardha), Ramrao Khuje (Pipardara, Nagpur), Vishnu Satpute (Karanja, Wardha), Omprakash Bhoge (Dongarpavli, Amravati), Shankar Sawant ( S aw a r g a o n – K a n h o b a , Washim), Namdeo Bhirad (Vivra Akola), Ashok Bhoyar (Tuwardari, Washim), Sopan Darmothe (Kadmapur, Buldana), Sukhdev Chandranarayan (Devthana, Washim), Uddhav Gawali (Amani, Washim), Rajendra Jadhav (Sukathi, Yavatmal), Aasaram Savarkar (Muthori, Bhandara) and Maroti Kokulwar (Ra jolichak, Chandrapur).
According to Vidarbha Jan Andolan Samiti president Kishore Tiwari, thousands of cotton growers in the worst-affected six districts of Yavatmal, Wardha, Akola, Amravati, Washim and Buldana have been unable to offload their produce as 86 procurement centres of the cotton cooperative marketing federation which buys from them under the state’s cotton purchase scheme, have been shut down. Tiwari claimed at least 22 centres including those in Wani, Ghatanji, Parwah have been closed by the federation officials claiming that they had exhausted storing space.
A federation official admitted that some centres were closed and said they would reopen on January 11.
“After the Wani police firing on December 5, the government was proactive in collecting cotton at the maximum support price of Rs 1990 per quintal. That continued for only few days. Now the farmers are left on their own. Taking advantage of sudden stoppage of procurement by federation centres, private traders have pegged down the rates and are paying less than Rs 1800 to farmers,” said Tiwari. He was skeptical of the announcement of procurement centres’ reopening before the Makar Sankranti holidays.

Farmers suicides

From Vandana Shiva

The Indian peasantry, the largest body of surviving small farmers in the world, today faces a crisis of extinction.

Two thirds of India makes its living from the land. The earth is the most generous employer in this country of a billion, that has farmed this land for more than 5000 years.

However, as farming is delinked from the earth, the soil, the biodiversity, and the climate, and linked to global corporations and global markets, and the generosity of the earth is replaced by the greed of corporations, the viability of small farmers and small farms is destroyed. Farmers suicides are the most tragic and dramatic symptom of the crisis of survival faced by Indian peasants.

1997 witnessed the first emergence of farm suicides in India. A rapid increase in indebtedness, was at the root of farmers taking their lives. Debt is a reflection of a negative economy, a loosing economy. Two factors have transformed the positive economy of agriculture into a negative economy for peasants – the rising costs of production and the falling prices of farm commodities. Both these factors are rooted in the policies of trade liberalization and corporate globalisation.

In 1998, the World Bank’s structural adjustment policies forced India to open up its seed sector to global corporations like Cargill, Monsanto, and Syngenta. The global corporations changed the input economy overnight. Farm saved seeds were replaced by corporate seeds which needed fertilizers and pesticides and could not be saved.

As seed saving is prevented by patents as well as by the engineering of seeds with non-renewable traits, seed has to be bought for every planting season by poor peasants. A free resource available on farms became a commodity which farmers were forced to buy every year. This increases poverty and leads to indebtedness.

As debts increase and become unpayable, farmers are compelled to sell kidneys or even commit suicide. More than 25,000 peasants in India have taken their lives since 1997 when the practice of seed saving was transformed under globalisation pressures and multinational seed corporations started to take control of the seed supply. Seed saving gives farmers life. Seed monopolies rob farmers of life.

The shift from farm saved seed to corporate monopolies of the seed supply is also a shift from biodiversity to monocultures in agriculture. The District of Warangal in Andhra Pradesh used to grow diverse legumes, millet, and oilseeds. Seed monopolies created crop monocultures of cotton, leading to disappearance of millions of products of nature’s evolution and farmer’s breeding.

Monocultures and uniformity increase the risks of crop failure as diverse seeds adapted to diverse ecosystems are replaced by rushed introduction of unadapted and often untested seeds into the market. When Monsanto first introduced Bt Cotton in India in 2002, the farmers lost Rs. 1 billion due to crop failure. Instead of 1,500 Kg / acre as promised by the company, the harvest was as low as 200 kg. Instead of increased incomes of Rs. 10,000 / acre, farmers ran into losses of Rs. 6400 / acre.

In the state of Bihar, when farm saved corn seed was displaced by Monsanto’s hybrid corn, the entire crop failed creating Rs. 4 billion losses and increased poverty for already desperately poor farmers. Poor peasants of the South cannot survive seed monopolies.

And the crisis of suicides shows how the survival of small farmers is incompatible with the seed monopolies of global corporations.

The second pressure Indian farmers are facing is the dramatic fall in prices of farm produce as a result of free trade policies of the W.T.O. The WTO rules for trade in agriculture are essentially rules for dumping. They have allowed an increase in agribusiness subsidies while preventing countries from protecting their farmers from the dumping of artificially cheap produce.

High subsidies of $ 400 billion combined with forced removal of import restrictions is a ready-made recipe for farmer suicides. Global prices have dropped from $ 216 / ton in 1995 to $ 133 / ton in 2001 for wheat, $ 98.2 / ton in 1995 to $ 49.1 / ton in 2001 for cotton, $ 273 / ton in 1995 to $ 178 / ton for soybean. This reduction to half the price is not due to a doubling in productivity but due to an increase in subsidies and an increase in market monopolies controlled by a handful of agribusiness corporations.

Thus the U.S government pays $ 193 per ton to US Soya farmers, which artificially lowers the rice of soya. Due to removal of Quantitative Restrictions and lowering of tariffs, cheap soya has destroyed the livelihoods of coconut growers, mustard farmers, producers of sesame, groundnut and soya.

Similarly, 25000 cotton producers in the U.S are given a subsidy of $ 4 billion annually. This has brought cotton prices down artificially, allowing the U.S to capture world markets which were earlier accessible to poor African countries such as Burkina, Faso, Benin, Mali. The subsidy of $ 230 per acre in the U.S is genocidal for the African farmers. African cotton farmers are loosing $ 250 million every year. That is why small African countries walked out of the Cancun negotiations, leading to the collapse of the W.T.O ministerial.

The rigged prices of globally traded agriculture commodities are stealing incomes from poor peasants of the south. Analysis carried out by the Research Foundation for Science, Technology and Ecology shows that due to falling farm prices, Indian peasants are loosing $ 26 billion or Rs. 1.2 trillion annually. This is a burden their poverty does not allow them to bear. Hence the epidemic of farmer suicides.

India was among the countries that questioned the unfair rules of W.T.O in agriculture and led the G-22 alliance along with with Brazil and China. India with other southern countries addressed the need to safeguard the livelihoods of small farmers from the injustice of free trade based on high subsidies and dumping. Yet at the domestic level, official agencies in India are in deep denial of any links between free trade and farmers survival.

An example of this denial is a Government of Karnataka report on “Farmers suicide in Karnataka – A scientific analysis”. The report while claiming to be “scientific”, makes unscientific reductionist claims that the farm suicides have only psychological causes, not economic ones, and identifies alcoholism as the root cause of suicides. Therefore, instead of proposing changes in agricultural policy, the report recommends that farmers be required to boost up their self respect (swabhiman) and self-reliance (swavalambam).

And ironically, its recommendations for farmer self-reliance are changes in the Karnataka Land Reforms Act to allow larger land holdings and leasing. These are steps towards the further decimation of small farmers who have been protected by land “ceilings” (an upper limit on land ownership) and policies that only allow peasants and agriculturalists to own agricultural land (part of the land to the tiller policies of the Devraj Urs government).

While the “expert committee” report identified “alcoholism” as the main cause for suicides, the figures of this “scientific” claim are inconsistent and do not reflect the survey. On page 10, the report states in one place that 68 percent of the suicide victims were alcoholics. Five lines later it states that 17 percent were “alcohol and illicit drinkers”.

It also states that the majority of suicide victims were small and marginal farmers and the majority had high levels of indebtedness. Yet debt is not identified as a factor leading to suicide. On page 32 of the report it is stated that of the 105 cases studied among the 3544 suicides which had occurred in five districts during 2000 – 2001, 93 had debts, 54 percent had borrowed from private sources and money lenders.

More than 90% of suicide victims were in debt. Yet a table on page 63 has mysteriously reduced debt as a reason for suicide to 2.6%, and equally m
ysteriously, “suicide victims having a bad habit” has emerged as the primary cause of farmers suicides.

The government is desperate to delink farm suicides from economic processes linked to globalisation such as rise in indebtedness and increased frequency of crop failure due to higher ecologic vulnerability arising from climate change and drought and higher economic risks due to introduction of untested, unadopted seeds.

This is evident in recommendation no. 4.3.24.3 “The government should launch prosecution on the responsible persons involved in misleading the public and government by providing false information about farmers suicide as crop failure or indebtedness” (page 113 of expert committee report).

However, farmers suicides cannot be delinked from indebtedness and the economic distress small farmers are facing. Indebtedness is not new. Farmers have always organised for freedom from debt.

In the nineteenth century the so call “Deccan Riots” were farmers protests against the debt trap into which they had been pushed to supply cheap cotton to the textile mills in Britain. In the eighties they formed peasant organisations to fight for debt relief from public debt linked to Green Revolution inputs.

However, under globalisation, the farmer is loosing her / his social, cultural, economic identity as a producer. A farmer is now a “consumer” of costly seeds and costly chemicals sold by powerful global corporations through powerful landlords and money lenders locally.

This combination is leading to corporate feudalism, the most inhumane, brutal and exploitative convergence of global corporate capitalism and local feudalism, in the face of which the farmer as an individual victim feels helpless. The bureaucratic and technocratic systems of the state are coming to the rescue of the dominant economic interests by blaming the victim.

It is necessary to stop this war against small farmers. It is necessary to re-write the rules of trade in agriculture. It is necessary to change our paradigms of food production. Feeding humanity should not depend on the extinction of farmers and extinction of species. Another agriculture is possible and necessary – an agriculture that protects farmers livelihoods, the earth and its biodiversity and public health.
~

Organic agriculture to me is the movement for peace, the deepest movement for peace, because it creates peace at that fundamental level where it rests on ecological security, creates economic and political and social security, the therefore doesn’t have any place for wars and violence and arms.

But there is another dimension to the peace making through organic agriculture, that it is by its very nature democratic. You cannot be an organic farmer and have Monsanto tell you exactly what to do: The earth tells you what to do. You cannot be an organic producer and not have relationships of a decentralized economy. It is that decentralized economy that creates conditions of peace.
~~